22nd March 2019

Red Notice

The INTERPOL ‘Red Notice’ system, a system designed to assist law enforcement officers, trace and ultimately detain individuals wanted for criminal offences that have since fled the jurisdiction and therefore evading justice, is time and time again highlighted as being a system that is subject to abuse and manipulation.

The system in principle is important, and a useful tool in seeking to ensure that individuals cannot escape justice by merely leaving the country, the reality however is that it, like a number of other mechanisms, has become overtly political, and subject to consistent manipulation by regimes seeking to silence dissent, and imprison detractors.

Example A (the name of the individual in question must be kept confidential), was an Egyptian national who instructed his legal team following two attempts to detain and extradite him on the basis of a Red Notice that had been issued without foundation.

The individual in question had left Egypt as he had publicly criticised President Sisi and therefore, justifiably feared for his safety.

He resided in Turkey initially but had to travel to a further country on business, upon landing he was arrested on the aforementioned notice and extradition proceedings were commenced. These proceedings were ultimately dismissed as the presiding judge found that the allegations being made by Egypt were entirely without foundation and that the process had been politically motivated. Client A returned to Turkey, but again had to travel to a further country, again on business, and was again detained and extradition proceedings commenced.

His team were able to demonstrate that the matters had already come before another court and dismissed, and in highlighting the position in Egypt regarding current or previous members of the opposition, it was found that Client A ought not to be extradited, and again, that the proceedings that Egypt sought to bring against him were politically motivated.

This is a situation that unfortunately, we are seeing time and time again.

Clients B and C have been subject to Red Notices issued at the behest of the UAE, again, on an entirely fabricated basis, with the sole intention of preventing an issue from being discussed. As with Client A, no offence has actually been committed, however, the UAE seeks to punish those that may disagree with its policies and its oppressive nature.

INTERPOL have confirmed that they are looking into the matter following receipt of detailed submissions from his legal team. It is hoped that INTERPOL agree with the position argued, and that both notices are removed.

There is however no sanction for such states that seek to manipulate the system however, merely because they may have been found to have issued an illegitimate request on one occasion, does not prevent them from continuing to seek to do so in respect of other individuals that it seeks to target.

Instalaw instructs a wider legal team in respect of such matters, a team that have represented individuals that have been targeted by numerous regimes, including those in the Middle-East, South-East Asia, and Europe, and a team who have been able to demonstrate that the position being espoused by those regimes is not as it seems on each and every occasion.

Simply because such a notice has been issued does not mean that it cannot be challenged outside of any formal extradition process.

If an individual believes that the notice is politically motivated, or inappropriate for any other relevant reason, the position can be challenged by way of requesting that the matter is considered directly by INTERPOL.

In our experience, INTERPOL will look at such requests, although their response is not always timely.

This does not detract from the most important issue however, that being that the system is in dire need of reform so as to enable it to be used for the reasons for which it was developed, rather than it being manipulated to become a tool for authoritarian and autocratic regimes to target citizens who have dared to merely exercise their fundamental rights and freedoms, and by doing so, have made themselves a target for that State.

It simply cannot be appropriate that an international agency such as INTERPOL is allowed to be used to silence individuals who in reality have committed no discernible offence.

It is essential that any individual targeted in this manner seeks appropriate legal advice and assistance at an early opportunity so as to try and deal with the matter before any extradition process is commenced.

28th February 2019

Instalaw offering ‘International Justice Services’

International Law

Instalaw are pleased to announce that they are now offering International Legal Assistance in a number of areas.

Instalaw, already specialises in a number of niche legal areas including Prison Law, Public Law, Community Care and Actions against public Authorities. They are one of the few firms in the country to hold a legal aid contract in each area.

Robert Welsh, Director, said ‘moving into the International Justice Market is a natural progression for us as a firm. We have always been passionate about the protection and rights of individuals on home soil and so we are delighted to be able to assist those abroad with various issues’.

‘In the current political climate the protection of individuals rights has never been more important. There appears to be a growing trend for the abuse of International Warrants for political purposes, such as INTERPOL Red Notices. We can help challenge such notices with the usual vigour and determination that we apply to our domestic instructions’.

As ever, a competitive tailored package of representation is available with fixed fees available in many cases. Please do not hesitate to contact us for further information.

12th February 2019

Instalaw Solicitor Debbie Heath on BBC News

Instalaw Solicitor Debbie Heath on BBC News

Congratulations to Instalaw Solicitor Debbie Heath who recently appeared on BBC news to discuss historic child abuse.

Debbie is recognised as an expert in her field where she has represented many individuals at the recent government inquiry into child sexual abuse.

She also has vast experience in bringing compensation claims for the victims of such horrific crimes.

We wish Debbie good luck at the Nottingham Law Society Awards in April where she has been nominated for Junior Lawyer of the year!

31st January 2019

Instalaw Solicitors win the Client Care Initiative of the Year 2019 Award at the Modern Law Awards

The prestigious Modern Law Awards took place on the 31st January at the famous Victoria Warehouse in Manchester.

Instalaw solicitors were shortlisted for awards in both Client Care Initiative of the Year and Business growth.

The Criteria for both awards were:

Client Care Award

  • “Has exceeded expectations of basic client care and professionalism;
  • Are able to demonstrate that the standard of their services has helped to increase profitability of their company and business levels through client word of mouth;
  • Are able to show an innovative approach in improving and maintaining all aspects of client care, from initial client contact to completion of issues;
  • Able to maintain a high level of client care even in periods of turbulence.”

  • Business Growth Award

  • “The judges are looking for a legal services business that has achieved exceptional growth – in scale, expanding practice areas or geographical coverage – over the last year, at the same time delivering improvement in client service and profitability;
  • We are looking to celebrate the successful, dynamic entrepreneurs within our industry;
  • The judges invite nominations from any organisation providing legal services to clients who has achieved substantial growth over the last year or so; large, established law firms, successful consolidations/mergers and high-growth start-ups or new entrants are all welcomed.“

  • Instalaw were successful runners up in the Business Growth category, however they were crowned proud winners of the Client Care Initiative of the Year Award 2019.

    The Directors said: “We are delighted to have been shortlisted for both awards but to come away as winners of Client Care Award 2019 was a real honour."

    “We have worked hard to build a practice with excellent client care standards and to be recognised for the hard work we put in and dedication we have for all of our clients is just fantastic."

    “We would like to thank everyone who has instructed us over the years and instilled trust in our representatives who have achieved a number of great outcomes.”

    Instalaw Solicitors are a growing firm with offices in Nottingham and Newcastle-under-Lyme. The firm specialises in Prison Law, Public Law, Actions against Public Authorities, Community Care, Judicial Review, Personal Injury and is actively involved in the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual abuse (IICSA).

    31st October 2018

    Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse - Child Abuse in Residential Schools

    The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse is the biggest Inquiry in UK history. The Inquiry is looking into many different areas where there have been allegations of Child Sexual Abuse. The Inquiry are now looking into child sexual abuse that took place in Residential Schools in the UK as the number of criminal convictions for child sexual abuse by school staff has surged. The investigation will explore how schools and other agencies respond to allegations of sexual abuse by school staff, and address broad questions of school culture, governance, leadership, training and recruitment.

    Multiple institutions are implicated in failures of child protection in schools, including local authorities, schools inspectorates and the police.

    The Inquiry is interested in hearing from victims and survivors of abuse who attended the following institutions:

  • Feversham School – Newcastle upon Tyne
  • St William’s School – Market Weighton
  • Sheringham Court School – Norfolk
  • Ashdown House Preparatory School – East Sussex
  • Sherborne Preparatory School – Sherborne
  • St George’s School – Wicklewood
  • Dalesdown School – Horsham
  • Chetham’s School of Music – Manchester, United Kingdom
  • The Purcell School for Young Musicians – Bushey
  • Yehudi Menuhin School – Cobham, Surrey
  • Wells Cathedral School – Somerset
  • Ripon Cathedral Choir School – Ripon, North Yorkshire
  • Westminster Cathedral Choir School – Westminster
  • Appletree School – Kendal Cumbria
  • Stony Dean School – Amersham, Buckinghamshire
  • Appletree School – Romsey
  • Chelfham Mill School – Barnstaple, Devon
  • Fullerton House School – Doncaster
  • Royal School Manchester – Heald Green
  • Marland School – Torrington, Devon
  • Muntham House School – Horsham
  • Southlands School – Lymington
  • West Heath School – Sevenoaks, Kent

  • Our Debbie Heath will again be heading a team in relation to this Inquiry. She represents a large number of individuals in the Nottingham strand of the Inquiry and she is trusted by numerous charities to represent their clients.

    She has a dedicated number of professionals, including barristers who assist her on a daily basis and they will all work with you to assist you through this process.

    She is also able to assist with claims for compensation.

    We are able to offer representation at no cost to the individual in nearly all cases.

    If you require any additional information about the inquiry itself, the process or have any other general queries please do not hesitate to contact Debbie on 0115 8246 555.

    3rd September 2018


    Instalaw are delighted to welcome two of the UK’s most experienced Public Law and Community Care solicitors to the firm as part of our ever expanding practice.

    Stuart and Martin need no introduction and we are thrilled that they have agreed to join us bringing with them their successful and well-established practices in the field of Public Law and Community Care and they jointly head up the firm’s newly formed Public Law and Community Care Department.

    Between them Stuart and Martin have over 19 years of experience of bringing successful claims against public bodies challenging decisions through Judicial Review proceedings and both have appeared with some frequency in the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court in some of the most important cases in recent legal history.

    Their track record of using Judicial Review to successfully secure services for the most vulnerable in society has earnt them a national reputation in their field.

    The department specialises in all challenges to decisions made by local authorities and government departments on grounds that they are unlawful, irrationals and/or procedurally unfair and which may commonly include;

  • Age Disputes for Unaccompanied Asylum Seeking Children;
  • Challenges to assessments for services under Section 17 & Section 20 Children Act 1989;
  • Re-settlement claims for young people leaving Youth Custody
  • Challenges to decisions for Asylum Seekers and their families under Sections 4, 95 & 98 of the Immigration and Asylum Act;
  • Failure to assess families with no recourse to public funds and provide services under the Children Act 1989;
  • Refusal to recognise a young person as being entitled to services as a care leaver and/or failing to provide specific services to care leavers to meet needs;
  • Refusing to grant leave applications for families under the Human Rights Act
  • Homelessness
  • Challenges to decisions made by the Prison Service and Parole Board
  • Trafficking and claims under the Modern Slavery Act

  • Stuart Luke

    Stuart is best known for his work with Unaccompanied Asylum Seeking Children challenging Age Assessments and decisions concerning services under the Children Act 1989.

    In 2017 Stuart was nominated by the British Refugee Council for his work for unaccompanied children following a number of seminal judgments establishing through Judicial Review rights for Age Disputed Children and at a ceremony in July 2017 he was awarded the prestigious Legal Aid Lawyer of the Year Award.

  • Stuart has been successful in a number of leading cases securing fundamental rights and services for unaccompanied children and vulnerable adults. Some of Stuart’s reported cases include;
  • AA v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 138 - establishing that the Home Office had acted unlawfully in detaining unaccompanied children on grounds that their appearance suggested they were not a child but significantly over the age of 18
  • S, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Croydon & Anor [2017] EWHC 265 (Admin) - for the first time in securing a finding from the High Court that pending an Age Assessment an unaccompanied child is entitled to be accepted and looked after as a claimed child under Section 20 Children Act 1989
  • R(Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5
  • R (on the application of ZM and SK) v The London Borough of Croydon (Dental age assessment) [2016] UKUT 559 (IAC)
  • Watson & Others (Brice & Lewis) C203/15 and C698/15 CJEU
  • R (on the application of MM (Lebanon)) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2017] UKSC 10

  • Stuart works with a number of leading national charities including the British Refugee Council, British Red Cross and Children’s Society to name only a few in representing and challenging the rights for and on behalf of vulnerable children. Stuart was recently described by a leading charity as ‘the go to solicitor in England for advice on Age Disputes’ reflecting his work and commitment to this area in which he is one of the leading solicitors in the UK.

    Martin Bridger

    Martin is highly regarded as one of the leading solicitors in the Public Law field. For the past ten years he has been acting for the most vulnerable members of society, securing successful outcomes against all limbs of the state.

    Martin has a profound knowledge of the law in relation to all aspects of Public Law and Community Care work and he is considered by a large number of charitable organisations to be the leading solicitor in the Public Law field for his work in assisting vulnerable young children, seeking support from Social Services Departments.

    Martin has been successfully involved in numerous reported and leading cases in recent years which have helped frame and develop the legal framework for the years to come. Some of Martin’s reported cases include:

  • R(Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5
  • R(Sanneh & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWCA Civ 49
  • R(HA) v University of Wolverhampton [2018] EWHC 144
  • R(Vigrass) v the Parole Board [2017] EWHC 3022
  • R(Ghulam & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWHC 2639
  • R(DL & Anr) v London Borough of Newham [2011] EWHC 1127

  • Stuart and Martin are available to accept cases directly from individuals or from charities or agencies assisting and advocating on behalf of a service user that have received a decision for which advice and assistance may be required to establish whether a claim might arise or be possible.

    Anyone wishing to seek advice or assistance can contact the Public Law and Community Care Team by telephone on 01782 560155 or

    The firm benefits from offering legal aid to bring judicial review proceedings subject to confirming eligibility or alternatively a tailored fixed fee services can be agreed subject to discussion.